911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov You tube 3rd Truth? UPDATED!

UPDATED WITH LINK FOR THE BALANCE & FAIRNESS PLUS A VIDEO ABOUT NANO-THERMITE BY PROF. Dr. STEVEN JONES ON THE BOTTOM OF THIS ARTICLE

I just saw the nuclear demolition series on you tube by Dimitri Khalezov, and he may be sincere, but I do not agree with him on points.

9 11 cruisemisslenoseexit 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov You tube 3rd Truth? UPDATED!

Nose of plane or rocket emerging from WTC

The point of this article, besides that Khalezov’s theory does not seem logical, is that hairsplitting & division over too small details is not worth it, especially when so little proof is offered, compared to for example Steven Jones’ solid research into nano-thermite. IMHO it is better to unite on the main proven points and specifically on the obvious media & Government deceptions of 9-11.

I accept his own comment to commenters denying that he is an Israeli plant, and that he actually believes that the Mossad had much to do with these 9-11 attacks. So does hard-hitting real journalist Christopher Bollyn, the ex president of Italy Cossiga, and ex foreign German minister Von Buelow, and many others. (See www.bollyn.com on our blogroll, who does very convincing journalism and thorough research on the discovery of Dr. Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University of nano-thermite in the WTC dust.

The picture above and those below show the nose of the plane (OR of the pod missile from the plane? Discussed below) exiting the WTC tower’s other side.

CBCexit2C 1 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov You tube 3rd Truth? UPDATED!

CBCexit11 1 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov You tube 3rd Truth? UPDATED!

So that was not a super-imposed video graphics trick, as Khalezov tried to show us with TV footage taken from the other side of the building, as this is from another angle. Just after this shot, this nose cone (of either the plane but most likely the faster missile!) explodes and disintegrates in a cloud.

Jumper1 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov You tube 3rd Truth? UPDATED!

wreckage 300x225 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov You tube 3rd Truth? UPDATED!

Windows piece of 737 fuselage at WTC

This left photo below shows a piece of the fuselage with windows at the WTC. But, our dear Dimitri, whether he sent himself or others sent him to divide and confuse, denies real physical planes in the WTC center attacks, which makes him a regular “no-planer”. [Dis-informants that insist that all the many movies & footage filmed on 9-11 by the media, and even by normal individual bystanders, were all fake video graphics (?), and that there were no real physical planes that flew into the buildings. That seems preposterous!]

flash 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov You tube 3rd Truth? UPDATED!Also the steel columns at the impact holes in the WTC (above right photo) are obviously seen to bend inwards. And there is no way on earth, as Khalezov believes, that it could have been caused by some explosion from inside the building to create an artificial impact hole for a video-graphic “no-plane”, for the simple reason that the steel beams would be seen bending outwards! No explosives fastened to the outside of the WTC perimeter wall could ever have bent the beams inwards, as the photo shows they do, because there would have been no immovable base for them to react against in order to blow inwards. They would have exploded into the air causing little damage.

2hit 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov You tube 3rd Truth? UPDATED!And where did the airplane engine, which by the way did not belong to a hijacked 767 (but some say to a 737 instead?) come falling down from? If that was placed by some of Cheney’s traitorous CIA boys for example, then people would have seen them unloading that damaged engine onto Murray street. That would make it the first “no plane engine” in history, which  is ludicrous of course.

PS: There is new research from Christopher Bollyn that the engine actually may have belonged to the missile aboard the plane, fired just before entering the building, as seen in the famous flashes recorded from all cameras and angles. [see photos]

missilepunch 300x107 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov You tube 3rd Truth? UPDATED!The planes were real enough alright to make the steel beams bend inwards, and the planes’ aluminum hulls could obviously enter into the holes made by the explosions seen on much footage, where from the right side of the nose of the plane a bright flash is seen from either some bomb or missile, creating the very opening in the external steel frame which the rest of the plane then could easily enter, as seen in these photos on the left.nosetonose 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov You tube 3rd Truth? UPDATED!

Those heavy 737 engines are titanium steel and packed enough of a wallop to those welded joints of the front steel grid, to be able to break and bend the  beams inwardly and thus for the rest of the plane to follow. By the way, that missile had to be mounted somewhere else than inside the plane’s fuselage, as it could never have come through some hole in the actual fuselage packed with instruments and cockpit stuff.

And thus an external pod would have been the only logical solution! And to any people with common sense, such a pod is very visible, which proves that these planes were especially fitted for this infernal mission, and were switched to take the original planes’ places, when the transponders were turned off.

Not only is the pod visible in the animated gif above right, but if you look carefully even a smokey pressure wave seems to be coming from the back of the pod as it enters the building, probably caused by pressure of the igniting missile.

woman wtc 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov You tube 3rd Truth? UPDATED!

And who knows, but what if the front of the specially build 737-s wings were also stuffed with explosives in order to cut through that thick steel perimeter wall? It sure looks like a clean cut to me, when you look at the photo. You can also clearly see that the main cavity inside the hole was also situated on the right side of the central fuselage, where the strange pod was observed under the right wing!

That pod shouldn’t be there!

bigpod 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov You tube 3rd Truth? UPDATED!

 

Watch this video trailer, a new preview clip from the movie covering the 9/11 aircraft anomalies.

Is the reason why Mike Rivero (whatreallyhappened.com) denies there is a “pod” on the outside of those WTC planes, and even denies a missile at the Pentagon, because he is a merely an obfuscator of truth and dis-info artist?
I always did wonder why American authorities leave former NASA employee Michael Rivero in peace, whereas he is supposedly such a threat to their schemes? Don’t you wonder? Unless of course he is controlled opposition as well. Go figure!

Mike Rivero is, after all, one of the greatest anti-Christian brainwashing forces for the NWO, steering millions of Westerners away from our pure origins of the faith of our forefathers in Jesus towards a ghoulish grave and hellish Hades!
As Jesus put it, “He that is not with me, is against me; and he that gathers not with me scatters abroad.” (Matthew 12:30) What is Rivero? A gatherer or a scatterer?
[Dimitri, in his comments below, thought that we were talking here about him, which was not the case at all. But he jumps to many conclusions.]

911 bomb 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov You tube 3rd Truth? UPDATED!Dimitri’s other point we can’t agree with, is that “the buildings disintegrated from the bottom first.” When you look at the footage of the demolition of the top [SEE FOR YOUR SELF IN THE FIRST FEW MINUTES OF THE 9-11 GOOGLE VIDEO BELOW AT THE END OF THIS ARTICLE!], you will clearly see the section of top floors disintegrating on itself first, until it reaches the level of the plane’s entrance. Only then… the rest of the building starts to explode floor by floor first, and then goes finally down. That is plainly visible and contrary to what Dimitri states. According to him, the bottom disintegrated before the top which stayed pretty much together in one piece until it hit the bottom. That’s not what you see on the movie.

thermitedripping 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov You tube 3rd Truth? UPDATED!

Steel beam shows dripping steel from diagonal shape charges.

Also the janitor who was in the cellar, Rodrigues, witnessed the blowing out of the basement’s lower levels just moments before the plane hit the building at the top. That was long before the towers fell! According to professional demolition experts, they normally blow out the bottom of a building first and then collapse the super structure into the cavity thus created. And that is exactly what witnesses saw and heard in this huge explosion seconds before the 2nd plane hit the building, that blew out massive steel doors as if they were tin cans.

Also one of Dimitri’s You-tube commentators stated, that months after the collapse and debris clearing, some of the clearing crew actually walked around in the underground level mall stores still intact with goods! Another corroborating fact is that authorities also recovered the trucks with gold bullion that never made it out on time, under the building.

If Dimitri’s analysis would be correct, then the underground nuclear explosion under the basement would have destroyed and sucked up all that stuff in a minute, into that consummating nuclear plasma hell hole under the building. Also there should have been three cavities in existence under WTC 1, 2 and 7 today, that would need filling up with tons and tons of material to be able to start building replacing towers on those spots.

And thus dear Dimitri, at the least, seems like a tenacious fellow who either wants to make a mint from the sales of his largely (IMHO) dis-info book, or at the most was sent perhaps to poison the 911-Truth well of TRUE established info. And to a certain extent he does, as he calls all other theories outside of his own… “Konspairisi” theories! (Ha! Cute accent.) Whereas his theory is just as much a conspiracy theory as any others, like his conspiracy theory that the media “faked airplanes on TV really weren’t there?

Chips of nano thermitic material WTC small 300x227 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov You tube 3rd Truth? UPDATED!Also he doesn’t seem to (or want to?) understand the nano-thermite type demolition, which was sprayed onto steel beams and walls, and then by the extreme high temperatures ignited by the additional explosives cutting the steel super structure at last, turning it into an equal explosive force that demolished both steel and concrete of the buildings!

These massive amounts of nano-thermite and perhaps thermate, explain also the pools of molten steel, and the many months lasting fire down in the basement, which was obviously still intact, containing the fire. If it really had been an underground nuke, all that molten steel would have sunk deep into the 200 meter deep crater UNDER the actual 27 meter deep basement. But it didn’t! Why?

So dear Dimitri! Where are you coming from? Just from yourself from a desire to sell your book? Or did someone else sponsor you plus that amazing well-done, expensive 26 part documentary? On which station was that ever aired by the way? We would all like to see some answers to these and other questions. Just calling us names as “conspiracy theorists” and ad hominim attacks do not answer these and other points and questions we brought out.

————————————————————————-

Anyhow, when we get to Heaven eventually, we’ll be able to get all the real answers finally to all these nagging questions! We’ll get to see the true 3D records in God’s “True History of All Time Museum”, where also all these other 20th and 21st century deceptions, which are far more numerous than all other ones before, will be shown and explained to those of us who will then still care to understand how Satan and his minions actually managed to deceive the worldlings and destroy so many of the poor people on Earth.

But until then, the Powers-that-be (PTB) will continue to confuse and divide us, so they can take us over easier and so we can’t dethrone them.  “Divide and conquer” has always been the Devil’s favorite tactic. I just hope that Dimitri is not one of the dividers! I would not suggest to watch this 26 part series on You Tube. It is a waste of time, enough for me to have done so. (Be thankful I did it for you.)

As far as all the murder, mayhem, and destruction happening in this world, it is nothing compared to what God will do to the NWO’s evil system at its very end, at Armageddon, after His children will have been taken out of this evil murderous world through the long-awaited resurrection of all Anno Dominium Saints.

The following prophecy paints what is in store for this cruel world until God finally takes it over and renews and readies it for the meek, mainly 3rd World Asian, African and Latin survivors, who will then finally inherit the Earth during the imminent Millennial reign of Christ and His followers. But I’m afraid that the evil West–be they prince or pauper–will be subject to the following in Isaiah 24:

1 Behold, the LORD makes the earth empty, and makes it waste, and turns it upside down, and scatters abroad the inhabitants thereof.
2 And it shall be, as with the people, so with the priest; as with the servant, so with his master; as with the maid, so with her mistress; as with the buyer, so with the seller; as with the lender, so with the borrower; as with the taker of usury, so with the giver of usury to him.
[so not only the bankers!]
3 The land shall be utterly emptied, and utterly spoiled: for the LORD has spoken this word.
4 The earth mourns and fades away, the world languishes and fades away, the haughty people of the earth do languish.
5 The earth also is defiled under the inhabitants thereof; because they have transgressed the laws, changed the ordinance, broken the everlasting covenant.
6 Therefore has the curse devoured the earth, and they that dwell therein are desolate: therefore the inhabitants of the earth are burned, and few men left.

wali13 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov You tube 3rd Truth? UPDATED!Personally I care for all men, but actually a lot less for the violent, boorish, proud Americans, than for their millions of global victims, like this poor Iraqi boy called Wali in the photo here.

1-1/2 million Iraqis were murdered, because Americans (especially US evangelical warmongering Zionists!) have forsaken the God of Love that once made them great, and have become just like disobedient Israel they so much worship, which now leads them by their media-nose into attacking Iran which probably will result in World War 3. Sad to say, through their wrong choices, all of us in the rest of the world will be heavily affected as well!

“The wicked shall be turned into Hell and all the nations that forget God!” Psalm 9:17.

I guess we all get the kind of government we deserve.

WATCH THIS 9-11 TRUTH MOVIE & SEE THE TOWERS EXPLODE BEFORE THEY FALL!

If the anti-God New World Order is able to deceive millions like this in plain sight, how about the “65 million year evolutionary dinosaur” hoax foisted on us to scare us out of our faith!

PROF. DR. STEVEN JONES ON NANO THERMITE RESEARCH

FOR THE BALANCE I HAVE INCLUDED THIS LINK, DO READ THE COMMENTS UNDER THE ARTICLE AS WELL:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/02/08/jb-campbell-dimitri-khalezov-on-9-11/
Here is a powerpoint on 9-11 you may find interesting.

(Visited 834 times, 1 visits today)

Related Posts:

25 comments for “911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov You tube 3rd Truth? UPDATED!

  1. Ispeed
    April 4, 2010 at 11:26 am

    I just finished watching and I think he is fight on

    The WTC external wall of 5 inches in two section each 2.5 inches each would shred the thin skin of he plane. I saw comments on the video that there is no comparison between structural construction steel and Armor plate at Dimitri claims.

    In fact they are very similar to MIL-A-46100 Steel!

    Structural steel

    .1.1. All hot-rolled steel plate used in fabrication of rigid frames shall conform to the requirements of ASTM Specification A-572. Minimum yield point shall be 50,000 PSI.
    3.1.2. AB hot-rolled steel sheets shall conform to the requirements of ASTM Specification A-570, Grade 50.
    3.1.3. Beyond 1/4″ and up, flange material (bars) shall be ASTM A-36 modified to 50 KSI yield.

    Also the Treaty on nuclear explosives for peaceful purposes is real too!

  2. Power Point Paradise
    April 4, 2010 at 12:02 pm

    That is why in videos of both planes a short flash is visible just before entrance into the building, where some kind of rocket or explosion opens the steel wall to let the aluminimum (AND TITANIUM & STEEL plane engines and keel) plane enter. You can see it by the hole it created.

  3. April 4, 2010 at 3:41 pm

    Hi. I am the very person who made these videos – i.e. Mr. Dimitri A. Khalezov. Reading the above article with keen interest I found it being nothing else than a masterpiece of ‘unbiasedly-biased ‘ classical genre of disinformation formerly common in the best pieces of ‘biasedly-unbiased’ classical anti-Soviet propaganda. I do admit that the author of this article is indeed a professional – he is far from being a primitive hysterical type of a ‘US patriot’ or an uneducated main-stream ‘9/11 conspiracy theorist’. His approach indeed seems ‘unbiased’ and ‘polite’ enough. Nonetheless, it must not deceive you. Even if the Author made it bold enough to refer to the Most High and Jesus Christ in violation of the Commandment No.3. The Most High does not pay attention to screams of liars, especially those who claim to be ‘Christians’, but came back to slave-owning Egypt and now reside right under a shade of the Egyptian pyramid with an eye of Satan on top of it. Yes, dear Author of this article, when we arrive to the Heaven you will indeed learn the truth. However, unlikely you will be ever allowed to visit to the supposed ‘museum’ you have mentioned. There will be some other kind of ‘entertainment’ for you in the World to Come and this ‘entertainment’ would not be pleasant at all. I am pretty certain about it. For the rest of the readers of this article – I suggest you just watching the movie (all of its 26 parts preferably), perhaps visting my web site http://www.nuclear-dmolition.com, in addition, and to form your own, independent opinion. Do not allow your opinion to be formed by those ‘unbiasedly-biased’ professional propagandists akin to those who wrote this article. Try to make the opinion of your own. Thanks for anyone’s attention.

  4. April 4, 2010 at 3:44 pm

    Sorry – correction to the previous post. the web site is http://www.nuclear-demolition.com it was mentioned above with a misspell.

  5. Power Point Paradise
    April 4, 2010 at 5:14 pm

    Dear Dimitri,
    I am honored by your visit to our humble site. Thanks for your comment. Could you please answer the questions and points that we put forward in our article above. It would be very elucidating, and perhaps we would start to see things more your way, if they make sense! Thank you in advance. May God bless us with truth and love!
    Sincerely,
    Lu Xian Sheng

  6. Seeker
    April 6, 2010 at 4:57 am

    Um yes, Dimitri Khalezov if you went through all the trouble of making a 26 parts series on the topic and you even came to this site to comment, then please do us all a favor and answer the questions regarding some of the possible holes/inconsistencies in your theory. It does not show much professionalism to trash talk/bad mouth questions regarding your theory without really answering anything. Remember–A theory that cannot be examined is not worth ascribing to at all. Unfortunately, I fear that you can’t and wont respond in any meaningful way, simply cuz any holes in your theory would make your documentary of little worth/uninteresting and you would immediately lose on all the investment you’ve made into making and promoting your film. Which if that were the case, it would make perfect sense to just trash talk without really answering anything. It’s a shame that money drives both the deceivers and (most)conspiracy theorist, so in a sense they are just two sides of the same coin–both worship and are slaves to the same master–the father of lies.

  7. April 9, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    Hello to everyone. I am Dimitri A.Khalezov. In response to your repeated pleas to come back and to answer your questions, I came back and about to answer them, though, to be honest, I already see that you are pre-conceived, your opinions are embedded and you are not going to change them anyway. Moreover, I am certain that you are not honestly mistaken like typical zombies who mostly represent ran-and-file 9/11 ‘truthers’, because you are simply to clever for it. I think you are hired by those whose duty is to suppress any truth of the 9/11. Nonetheless, I will answer/address of your highly provocative questions/assaults. I quote: “I fear that you can’t and wont respond in any meaningful way, simply cuz any holes in your theory would make your documentary of little worth/uninteresting and you would immediately lose on all the investment you’ve made into making and promoting your film.” Answer: don’t worry, dear. I will. I did not make any ‘investment’ into this documentary. It is cheaply made and cost next to nothing. The ‘promoting’ of my film cost me a single monthly subscription on 512 kbs WiFi Internet connection – 450 Thai Baht a months (less than 15 USD). Not too expensive, hah? Answering the rest of your provocative questions:

    …. which makes him a regular “no-planer”. ——————- I do not consider my self a ‘non-planer’ because it is simply to low status for me. I don’t attach any importance at all to this particular argument. I am after the pulverization of steel, after exact positions and exact yields of the nukes and after re-defining of the ‘ground zero’ term in post-9/11 dictionaries. The fact that aluminum tubes can not penetrate steel being twice as thick as typical front armor of a tank is pretty self-evident to me (especially considering my military background) and I simply can’t afford to argue over this. In this circumstances calling me a ‘no-planer’ is about as offensive as calling you a ‘rounder’ (as opposed to ‘flatter’) in a hypothetic argument over question of exact shape of our Planet Earth.

    But here (above) is a picture of a piece of the plane (or rocket from the plane) exiting the WTC tower’s other side….. ————————– I do not believe this picture is genuine. I am sure it is product of cheap computer manipulation. Really cheap. Perhaps I could do it better if I really want to.

    Also, where did the airplane engine, which by the way didn’t belong to a hijacked 767 but a 737 instead, from where did that come flying down? If that was placed by Cheney’s traiterous, little CIA boys for example, then people would have seen them unloading that damaged engine onto Murray street. That would make it the first “no plane engine” in history! That is ludicrous of course. ———————— I don’t have any comment. I do not see any difficulty at all in planting bogus evidence in such circumstances. To feed fake videos of ‘plane’ impacts to various news agencies was far more difficult, still they were able to do it.

    …the steel beams would have been bending outwards! ———————– good question. However, if you plan this kind of extraordinary operation, you would find the way to attach explosives to create this effect. All you have to do is to place hollow-shape charges outside the perimeter columns – for example in between aluminum coating and actual steel in order to direct their energy inwards. Moreover, you MUST do this, otherwise, the section of the steel would be blown out to the street and instead of ‘plane engine’ and ‘landing gear’ your simpletons would find parts of the Towers perimeter on the street.

    The planes were real enough alright, to make them bend inwardly, and the planes’ aluminum hulls were obviously able to enter into the holes made by the explosions seen on much footage, where from the nose of the plane a bright flash is seen from either some bomb or rocket, creating the opening in the external steel frame so the rest of the plane could easily enter, as seen in this picture on the left. —————————- it sounds ridiculous to me, but if you sincerely believe this, I can’t help. It is the same as trying to convince you that neither Jesus Christ, nor his late mother will salvage sinners who dared to come back to Egypt by abolishing the Law of Moses and replacing it with masonic constitution. Everyone is apparently entitled to have his own beliefs.

    No more comments on the ‘planes’. I am unshaken in my belief that aluminum can not penetrate steel. Period. I am a ‘nuker’, not a ‘non-planer’. Don’t disturb me with this.

    … Go figure! Is he a great anti-Christ brainwashing force for the N.W.O, sending millions of Westerners away from the pure faith in Jesus of their honorable ancestors, to a dismal grave and Hades? Let’s hope he’s not. ———————— here you perhaps got it right. I do believe in Jesus Christ and in everything what he said. And I am very firm in this belief – my belief in that Jesus Christ said is as firm as the belief that aluminum can not penetrate steel. So, I am certain that everything would be exactly as Jesus promised: ALL of you will go to Hell. ALL. Because ALL of you practiced lawlessness in the land of Egypt. (ref. Matthew 5:17-20 in combination with Matthew 7:23, and US 1 dollar bill).

    The other points of Dimitri I don’t agree with, is that the buildings disintegrated from the bottom first. …. ————————– in my opinion time of propagation of ‘crushing wave’ in steel was in a split of a second. There fore the Tower was ‘pulverized’ from bottom upwards, however, disintegrated finally into the actual dust by the falling heavy Tower’s top and its final disintegration proceeded another way around. Which is pretty self-evident.

    Also the janitor who was in the cellar, Rodrigues, witnessed the blowing out of the basement’s lower levels just moments before the plane hit the building. ——————– I think that explosion had nothing to do with Towers’ demolition. It had to do with initial explosions designed to imitate the ‘planes’ impacts. Perhaps the 9/11 culprits wanted to damage some lifts or other infrastructure in order to complicate evacuation and maximize casualties. However, it is my guessing only. I don’t have any established opinion on this.

    … Another corroborating fact is that authorities also recovered the trucks with gold bullion that never made it out on time, UNDER the building. —————— these trucks were recovered in underground tunnels being at least 70 meters and farther away from the buildings’ footprints, not ‘under them’.

    If Dimitri’s analysis would be right, then the underground nuclear explosion under the basement would have destroyed and sucked up all that stuff in a minute, into that consummating nuclear plasma hell hole under the building. ——————— watch carefully parts 15 and 16 of the movie. There it is explained how precise were the nukes. Example – the nuke behind the WTC-7 did not damage U.S. Post Office- and Verizon buildings standing very close to the WTC-7. In the same manner a lot of underground premises outside of actual rings of destruction were spared. Nothing surprising at all.

    Also there should have been three cavities in existence under WTC 1,2 and 7 today, that would need filling up with tons and tons of material to be able to start building replacing towers on those spots.————————– they were. Just search in Google and ye shall find.

    And thus our dear Dimitri at the least seems like a tenacious fellow who wants to make a mint from the sales of his largely dis-info (IMHO) book ——————— this is not a question, but an assault.

    Also he doesn’t seem to (or want to?) understand the nano-thermite type demolition ———————— unlike you, lazy bones, I became an accomplished self-taught explosives expert when I was still in secondary school. My hobby was to steal explosive materials (and thermite alike) from a nearby military regiment, along with making explosives of my own, and explode, explode, explode, and explode them. I still have one of the most comprehensive collections of books on explosives and incendiary materials which I began to acquire when I was 10 years old. In addition to all of this, I eventually finished 5-years-long course of engineering military college (where I was the best student when it came to field engineering, explosive devices, incendiary devices (thermite), demolitions and the rest of related fields – due to my child time hobby). Don’t make me laugh, boys. Thermite does not melt steel to fluffy microscopic dust. While so-called ‘nano-thermite’ exists only in sick imaginations of those who are lazy to study the subject.

    So dear Dimitri! Where are you coming from? ———————- explained in the movie. Just by your self from a desire to sell your book? ———————– I haven’t even published it yet. Nothing to sell yet.
    Or did someone else sponsor you plus that amazing well-done, expensive 26 part documentary? ————————- it cost next to nothing, it was made in cheap private Thai studio, and I edited it entirely alone on my notebook. Cost me only a few packs of coffee which I consumed while editing it.
    On which station was that ever aired by the way? ———————– none. You question sounds a little bit idiotic, to be frank with you. Do you think any TV channel would dare to air such a thing? You must be insane.
    We would all like to see some answers to these and other questions.——————- you got my answers.

    Anyhow, when we, God’s children, will get to Heaven eventually, ————————— blessed are those who believe. But to me you do not look like, to be honest.

    I would not suggest to watch this 26 part series on You Tube. ———————- however, I strongly suggest watching them and don’t listen to the hypocrites like those who claim to be ‘children of God’ and pretend to believe that aluminum is indeed capable of penetrating steel, while thermite is capable of ‘melting’ steel into fluffy microscopic dust.

    As Jesus said there are only two kinds of people in this world, “Sheep and goats” (like Rivero & Rense) and also “He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathers not with me scatters abroad.” Matthew 12:30. Which are you? ——————— I am a sheep. And I am certain that you are a goat.

    ———— (ignored part) ————–

    “The wicked shall be turned into Hell and all the nations that forget God!” Psalm 9:17. I guess we all get the kind of government we deserve. ——————– here I can’t resist to completely agree with you. Wicked will go to Hell in the World to Come. While still Here you definitely deserve the kind of government that could boldly print an Egyptian pyramid with an eye of Satan right on your ridiculous green papers that replaced former gold- and silver money for you.

    Any more questions?

  8. Power Point Paradise
    April 9, 2010 at 6:46 pm

    No. No more questions. Dear Dimitri. Thank you so much for your kindness to take time out to answer them to the best of your ability. May God bless us all with love and truth. Greetings from Taiwan.
    PS: And thus dear readers, it seems pretty obvious that Dimitri indeed was not sent by secret Russian intelligence, but sent solely by his lone self. I do apologise.

  9. fabien
    August 14, 2010 at 8:33 pm

    Hi, I apologyse in advance for my poor english because i am french…
    the planes theory (fake images, no planes) from Dimitri is the weakest point of his own theory. For the rest, i think he found the solution ! Another website explain that when you “explode” a building with dynamite, 1/3 of the building is visible on the ground after demolition (its the normal ratio) and you have to get ride of this huge pile of debris after. But in the case of the 2 towers, lets see : 1/3 on 400 meters make a pile of over 100 meters high no ? Same thing for the building n° 7, but where are the huge pile of debris ? Nowhere… They dont exist… You can look at the photos taken at the time: a tower of 400 meters become a flatcake on the ground after collapsing on itself, its totally impossible and absurd of course ! Only the transformation of the molecules of matiere by atomisation can transform steel (and the rest) in such incredible powder, leaving no trace of anything on groun zero, except the rest of the tower which the atomic bomb did not touched above 300 meters… Please, try to understand with an open mind what Dimitri explain, its clear like water, evident, simple and no other solution seams possible to me.. So Thank you Dimitri.. I also live in Thailand and one day I will phone you to invite you for a diner, for sure !
    FABIEN

    DEAR FABIEN,

    Normal controlled demolition blows up & hollows out the structure of the basement first! Then most of the debris falls into the basement. The special feature used in the demolition of the 3 WTC towers, was the NANO-THERMITE OR NANO THERMATE explsive which was most likely sprayed on the bottom of the floors, that turned most of the concrete into DUST. THAT’s why you see these gigantic clouds of dust emanating from the explosions. Most of the steel structure was cut–in ready-to-be-transported-by-truck pieces–with diagonal shape charges, as already explained and shown in picture above.
    I understand you are Dimitri’s friend (or Dimitri?) in Thailand and are trying to save his theory, but I am sorry, his theory is faulty and goes against logic.
    I know that my link comes up after him in Google, but his theory is wrong, while the nano-thermite/thermate theory has been proven now by several scientists. See http://www.bollyn.com
    But you can still invite your friend to dinner in Thailand. :)

  10. Otto Reiche
    October 22, 2010 at 10:41 pm

    Poor Americans, they can’t believe that their own government kill his citizens, like in Waco.

  11. anonymous
    February 8, 2011 at 10:38 pm

    Latest interview with Dimitri Khalezov at
    http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=625926

  12. tsubaki
    February 16, 2011 at 11:38 pm

    You should be aware that Steven Jones was a key figure in destroying cold fusion. The military-industrial complex, oil barons, and high-energy fusion physicists all got to keep making their billions.

  13. Power Point Paradise
    February 17, 2011 at 12:21 am

    I didn’t know that. Any references?

  14. Power Point Paradise
    February 19, 2011 at 8:46 pm

    Looked it up. Thanks. Didn’t know about that nor about Cold Fusion!
    Maybe he is trying to make amends for that by attacking the 9-11 cover up. He is some kind of believer and getting up there in age. Gettting right with God? I do think the nano-thermite discovery is quite an expose!

  15. tsubaki
    February 20, 2011 at 10:19 pm

    PPP,

    Getting right with his handlers would be my guess. Once you get into some of this stuff, you can’t exactly leave.

    I’m afraid we’ll have to disagree on the nano-thermite idea. I think nukes as in Khalezov’s view seem to be the only reasonable way of dealing with various pieces of evidence, such as leukemia, large molten areas that lasted for months, and the dustification, being some of the issues. Also, high levels of Strontium, Yttrium, and other elements of nuclear decay were in the dust according to the USGS report. Having said that, though, various explosives would have been used in the op, so why not some thermite, too?

  16. Power Point Paradise
    February 21, 2011 at 3:04 am

    Right. You said it. A collection of methods. I see columns sheared diagonally with molten steal from shape charges. I saw the steel columns blowing away from the building in neat pieces. I saw entire pieces of front steel lattice several stories high falling down. I SAW the peer reviewed reports of nano thermite. I SAW the golden steel pouring out of the top floor with white whisps of smoke. I saw the top exploding and disintegrating before the rest of the building started to explode & fall. I saw the standing spires of the box coumns veering back and forth denued from its side girders. Yes a variety. I don’t know about Dimitri’s theory. I don’t think all of this is the trouble. Unity on the simple stuff to get together and sue the criminals. THAT is always the problem. We have enough evidence.

  17. Gearóid
    March 3, 2011 at 3:52 am

    So what hit the Pentagon in your honest opinion?

  18. Power Point Paradise
    March 3, 2011 at 7:04 pm

    IMHO this picture (see URL) shows what I believe happened! A FLY OVER!
    http://thepentacon.com/images/Flyover.gif

    I believe most of what this website has to say on the subject, called the Pentacon Fly Over!

    They make a pretty good case for
    1. A United airlines size plane that flew NORTH past the Citgo gasstation and flew through the explosion cloud just OVER and away from the Pentagon. (That’s why the full videos were not released)

    a drastically reduced summary is: no plane hit the Pentagon on 9/11. CIT showed, through interviews of seventeen eyewitnesses, that the plane that was seen approaching the Pentagon flew over it and away, as explosives simultaneously detonated inside the building. This created an enormous fireball, filling the sky with dense, black smoke, which obscured the escaping plane. Observers who saw the plane head toward the Pentagon, and next saw the fireball, falsely but understandably concluded that the plane had hit the building. However, the airliner was seen after the fireball by several people, including a Pentagon police officer.

    2. They deny, however, a missile that I believe came from one direction and knocked over the lightpoles, and knocked out the punch out hole 6 reinforced concrete walls deep inside the Pentagon. Their point: There are NO witnesses to a missile.

    But who REALLY knows, excep the insiders of course! I don’t have any way of knowing that 2. is right or not, but no matter, either way we have been deceived by the Pentagon as to what really happened there that day. But the “impact hole” was definitely too small for a big plane that aeronautically couldn’t even fly that low at that speed, nor in the circle manoever that Hani Hanjour presumably pulled off.
    But what exactly happened at the Pentagon is not so much the issue, since we know more about what happened in Manhattan, that it was one big controlled demolition, and Buidling 7 wasn’t even hit by a plane! So it was some big theatre wool that was pulled over our eyes.

    SEE ALSO: http://citizeninvestigationteam.blogspot.com/

  19. tsubaki
    March 4, 2011 at 10:20 pm

    PPP,

    If I were you, I’d be very hesitant to take much of anything at face value. The criminals have trillions of dollars to confuse every aspect of 911.

    By the way, I disagree with the issue of unity in a sense. First of all, most of the Internet involved with 911 is on someone’s payroll, and part of their job is to provoke fights. The second issue is that proving controlled demolition is counterproductive. The relevant Feds think they are fighting terrorists with nukes, and they can’t let the masses know. Of course it was a controlled demolition. Many of them think they are doing the right thing. Why do you think Silverstein admitted it?

  20. tsubaki
    March 4, 2011 at 10:25 pm

    Gearoid,

    My opinion is that only a Russian Granit or internal explosives could have done it. That, or the photos have been faked. American missiles are too lightweight. American war strategies are very different from Russian ones. The US goes around the world intimidating everyone while the Russians need something to stop the US from attacking. Thus, great short-range missiles.

  21. Massudo
    June 17, 2011 at 11:30 pm

    It’s ridiculous THEY had to change the definition of “Ground Zero”. does Steven Jones knows what that means?

    NUCLEAR DEMOLITION is the only explanation….

  22. Power Point Paradise
    June 18, 2011 at 12:52 am

    Just a name of a place doesn’t make it the only explanation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *