Sumerian stone head of a “mythical” creature… or a Saurolophus?

Photo:Viewing a “Sumerian stone head of a mythical creature, Mesopotamia, Circa 2000 BC” on Sale at Auction in November 2009. Source: Mossgreen.

Sumerian Unicorn?

This piece was exhibited in an Auction catalogue for Fiine Arts auction that took place last year. (Fine Australian & International Art & Antiques ) It appears to have been purchased at the minimum bid of $148.38 by an unknown bidder. The auction house identified the piece as that of a “mythical creature” from Mesopotamia, circa 2,000 B.C. (Size 5cm)

sauro sumer skull Sumerian stone head of a “mythical” creature… or a Saurolophus?Far from being “mythical”, this piece of ancient art very clearing and in exacting detail pictures a hadrosaurine dinosaur, probably a saurolophus. The parasaurolophus hadrosaurine dinosaur is another possible identification because they were virtually identical to saurolophus in size and head structure. The parasaurolophus had the longer horn. Para means similar or like, so the name parasaurolophus was given to this creature because it was so similar to saurolophus.

Did dinosaurs become extinct 65 million years ago? Why then do accurate representations of them appear in the art of ancient peoples? This piece proves that man and dinosaur co-existed. Given the headgear of these dinosaurs, if they lived in the time of man they are excellent candidates for the “Unicorn” position. After all, unicorn merely means “one horn”.

Saurolophus

“Saurolophus is a genus of large hadrosaurine duckbill that lived about 69.5-68.5 million years ago, in the Late Cretaceous of North America (Canada) and Asia (Mongolia); it is one of the few genera of dinosaurs known from multiple continents. It is distinguished by a spike-like crest which projects up and back from the skull. Saurolophus was a herbivorous dinosaur which could move about either bipedally or quadrupedally.

READ REST OF ARTICLE

(Visited 136 times, 1 visits today)

Related Posts:

1 comment for “Sumerian stone head of a “mythical” creature… or a Saurolophus?

  1. Not So Fast
    October 13, 2011 at 4:18 am

    Slow down there, fella! Simply because a correlation exists between a dinosaur skull and the sold mythical creature does NOT mean that dinosaurs and humans co-existed. It can mean that those ancient people found a dinosaur skull and “fleshed” it out, perhaps, but it does not conclusively prove anything. Report reponsibly if you wish to be believed!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


7 − = two