THE AC "ANTI-CULT" MOVEMENT VERSUS "THE FUNDAMENTALISTS"

The False Prophet and the Antichrist will slowly but surely take over the world with their One World Religion worshipping Lucifer or Satan. In order to do so, the Antichrist forces in the world have already for quite some time now started a "de-Christianisation process" and a campaign to destroy the image, credibility and reputations of the so-called traditionalist religions of Islam, Judaism and Christianity!
Their clergies, doctrines, practice and beliefs have been steadily attacked in the media, ridiculed, and demonised! So much so, that nowadays public opinion is more and more against these three faiths, calling them names like "fundamentalists" or worse.
"Fundamentalists" instead of being a sociological term of believers who take their foundation or their Holy Books literal, now has shifted meaning to "narrow minded bigots, that are at the least fanatics, religious nuts, and legalistic followers of non humane laws, and at the most even "dangerous", "psychotic", violent and even potential "religious terrorists!"
This campaign mostly carried on through the powerful tools of the Media, has succeeded in polarising and marginalising the followers of these traditional religions of the World, the socalled monotheistic religions, as their worship of God or Allah is opposed to the worship of Satan. But especially the smaller, more dedicated small groups of believers, called cults or sects! Or their new sociological term: NRM-s! New religious movements.
There has even sprung up an ACM movement, the Anti Cult Movement, which has made very succesful inroads in the U.S and Europe to demonise and attack and even outlaw NRM-s!

This anti-God campaign will come to a point that the Antichrist and False prophet will completely outlaw these religions making them illegal, even hounding and persecuting their followers to death. This will for the greater religions be during the "Great Tribulation", but for te smaller ones, the NRM-s it has already started and will come to violent persecution in the first 3½ years of the seven years reign of the Antichrist.

The Daily BreakPoint, By Charles Colson After the attack on the World Trade Center TwinTowers

In the hours following the attack on New York and Washington, several words kept popping up in discussions and descriptions of the events:"tragedy," "fundamentalist," "madmen," and "senseless."
If taking note of this seems trivial, it's not. The words we choose have moral significance and shape how we see the world around us.
Take the word "senseless." The attacks were many things including uncivilized and evil. But they were not "senseless." They made good sense to the people who ordered them and carried them out. Calling them "senseless" and the perpetrators "madmen" or "cowards," strongly suggests that we can't imagine that there are people in the world who think differently than we do. And how do you defeat a foe if you can't understand what motivates him?

And make no mistake, the terrorists and their masters are motivated by words and the ideas behind those words. Too often we've lost sight of the fact that what a person thinks and believes always dictates how he acts. Ideas always have consequences. And ideas are expressed in words.
Another thing that our inattention to the precise meaning of words has cost us is language that makes clear distinction between right and wrong, good and evil. How many times have you heard the word "tragedy" used to characterize what happened on September 11?
But it wasn't a tragedy at all. When a child is accidentally struck by a car, that's a tragedy. When the car deliberately runs down the child, it's murder. Likewise what happened on September 11 wasn't a "tragedy." It was an act of war. Calling it a "tragedy" drains it of moral significance. And this matters because people react differently to a tragedy than they do to an act of war.

Then there's the word "fundamentalist." A knowledge of the history of the church in the twentieth century reveals that "Islamic fundamentalist" is nonsense. It's like "Buddhist Pentecostal" or "Hindu Calvinist." The term "fundamentalist," you see, came from little booklets that orthodox Christians, in response to the pressures of modernity, used to lay out the basics, the "fundamentals," of the faith. It was a good term, used for those who were defending the truth of Scripture. It's a term that had absolutely nothing do with politics, much less violence.
Despite this, the word "fundamentalist" today has been transformed into a synonym for "unthinking fanatic," regardless of beliefs. Use the word in this way long enough and you'll begin to think that conservative Christians are the same as some violent, extremist cult of Muslims -- a case of very bad thinking, as George Orwell noted, preceded by a case of very bad language.

In upcoming months, Americans will be will debating issues that will not only determine our national security, but also what kind of people we are. The stakes will be higher than they have been in most of our lifetimes. We can't afford sloppy thinking and therefore we cannot afford sloppy language. Our words must reveal, rather than obscure, the truth.
Christians, who worship the savior who John called "the Word," must not only set an example in this regard, we must help those around us understand the importance of the words they use. The old ditty is wrong: it is not sticks and stones that really do harm, it's the words that can grievously mislead and hurt us.

Nineteen European countries violate religious liberty, says the 1998 report of the Helsinki International Federation for Human Rights. Religious liberty is in greater danger in Europe than during the communist era because many governments in both Western and Eastern Europe are supporting traditional religions at the expense of minorities, the report says. Violations of religious liberty are cited in Albania, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Georgia, Greece, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Moldavia, Norway, Romania, Russia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Yugoslavia.

The report cites many Western European countries, Adventist Press Service said. It noted a 1997 Austrian law that prohibits giving official recognition to any religion other than the 12 that already exist. In Greece, where 97% of citizens are considered to be members of the Orthodox Church, Protestants, Catholics, and other minorities are victims of discrimination, the Helsinki report says. Other nations of the European Union are in the process of preparing laws to reinforce the status of traditional religions while limiting smaller groups.

Recent investigations have been carried out by the French, Belgian, and German parliaments into the activities of minority religions under the guise of investigating "dangerous sects" and "psycho-groups." These governments have often prominently listed such groups as Jehovah's Witnesses, Hasidic Jews, charismatic Roman Catholics, evangelical Protestants and the Young Women's Christian Association (YWCA) to "warn" the public against them. Additionally, pan-European institutions such as the European Parliament and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe are considering issuing reports on "sects" that call for national "advice and information centers" to control "sects" and disseminate information on these "harmful" or "dangerous" groups.

Washington (WP)--
More than 100 religious leaders -- Roman Catholic, evangelical and mainstream Protestant and Jewish --have urged presidential candidates to repudiate the increasingly popular theory that a nuclear war with the Soviet Union, leading to the day of Judgment is foretold in the Bible.
The religious leaders said Tuesday they feared the political implications of the theory that is prevalent among much of the Christians right wing. If carried to its logical conclusion, arms negotiations would be pointless because nuclear war with the Soviet Union is seen as inevitable. The nuclear Armageddon theory is a perversion of the Holy Scripture and a danger to the security of our republic, " the religious leaders said in a statement released at a news conference.
Signers of the statement include officials of the National Council of Churches; several Roman Catholic bishops and heads of Roman Catholic religious order; the heads of two Protestant denominations, the United Church of Christ and the American Baptist Churches, USA, and several rabbis and assorted clergy and lay leaders.

Don Lawly--Phoenix Magazine
The label that anti-religious forces through the media have designed as new stigma for sincere religious people all over the world is "fundamentalists". This formerly innocent sociological term has been so misused, that it now stands for a bigoted, ethnic-cleansing, self-righteous, brittle, unbending, gun-toting, right-wing, religious radical or even terrorist in some cases. This is more and more applied across the board to every sincere believer, but especially people who don’t just go to church, but are more or less active in their religion.

The last 30 years an on-going polarisation has come about between the World's Public Opinion and Christian believers, through a de-christianisation campaign waged by Antichristian elements and their media. Hollywood, the Press, TV and now the Internet. They have been training the World's masses to think of believers in God, the Bible and the Koran in terms of "dangerous bigots."

Its not that the believers moved position. No! It’s the Antichristian forces who have stepped up their character assassination, slander and marginalisation of Gods followers. Also the world has deteriorated so much in mores and values, and in quality of life, that public life has become a pitfall for sincere believers in love and beauty! As a result, the real believers have had to step up their defense or had to at least assert their control over their own lives and families and religious followers. In some cases the climate in the World has gotten so bad for some of them, that they felt they had to step OUT, as much as the Hippies in the sixties decided to drop out of a system that they felt, had moved away from an acceptable way of living.

People in the West have been conditioned to believe that we live in a very "civilised", "democratic", "enlightened", "progressive", "liberal", "tolerant", "superior", "know-it-all", "advanced", "broadminded" society! Yet nothing could actually be further from the truth, as we see instead around us, a more and more materialistic, hedonistic, barbaric, fascist, spiritually destitute, regressive, totalitairian, intolerant, qualitative inferior, dull-witted TV consumerist, political correct, narrowminded society!

CIVILISED?
We witness now the most violent generation of history, more violent than Gengis Kahn, Rome and its gladiators, Feudalist slavery, and the Vikings. We don’t do it in such an open and crude way as they used to, but nicely, in "clean", push button smart bomb wars, killing many multiples of people than our "barbaric" forebears! Or by bulldozing Palestinian refugee camps in Shatilla, or bulldozing thousands of young Iraqi soldiers in their desert trenches, whereas many of them were capitulating. Totally contrary to the Geneva Conventions and Human Rights, so highly touted by the US and European governments!

DEMOCRATIC?
Maybe people at home in the West think so, but our indebted IMF slaves in the Third World don’t think so. They are surpressed by our multi national companies in banana republics, doing the dirty work for local henchmen, hireling kings and slave drivers, while we live lusciously on their backs and their hunger and their poverty.
And how is democracy at home? We vote! That is all we have to say. Our politicians believe in democracy and get voted into office. Once they get to the top, they discover that power is not in their hands, but that they are merely marionets in the hands of the real financial powers of this world, the filthy-rich international merchant families, like Rothchilds, Rockefellers, Getties, Duponts, Morgans, Goldman Sachs, Warburgs, etc. who rule the World through stooges, possession of the World's gold and their ownership and manipulation of the media.
We do not live so much in a DEMOcracy, but rather in a "MEDIAcrazy", which reduces us to MEDIOCRACY.

ENLIGHTENED? INFORMED? SUPERIOR?
Ha! Let's not waste paper on it…

A portion of a transcript of the April 21, 1993 Executive Intelligence Review interview with Lyndon LaRouche

Only the FBI and the Cult Awareness Network have actually claimed that it was the Branch Davidian members who set fire to the compound, as it is called. There is no evidence of that. There are simply the unsupported assertions of these people, who contradict themselves all over the place.

There is an article that appeared in the Houston Chronicle just a couple of days before this event, which is extremely significant in the sense that it shows what an honest group of journalists--not necessarily every last word, but well-informed and serious journalists--thought about the event, in contrast to those sections of the U.S. news media, such as CNN and so forth, which were being brainwashed, effectively, by a criminal association called the Cult Awareness Network.

What is behind the Houston Chronicle article, is the following set of facts.

Number one, that David Koresh wanted to go to trial. Why? Because he was certain, and his lawyers were certain, as the lawyers stated, they would win the trial.
Why? Because they did not start the shooting. An out-of-control ATF assault [team] started the shooting on the first day; the government knew this, of course, and knew the whole dirty story.

The dirty story is, that the Cult Awareness Network, a criminal association--that is, an association which engages in kidnappings and does lying and similar kinds of other unlawful activities, according to court record--using a convicted felon, this Rick Ross, who appeared on television often, as an affiant, and other persons associated with Rick Ross, planted a story into a corrupted Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Agency, which had been corrupted since 1986.

But a corrupted agency planted a false story by aid of their accomplices in Australia, so that a corrupted or misinformed, misled, ATF intelligence, actually bought a story concocted entirely by--at least on the surface--the Cult Awareness Network and its felon affiants. They accepted this story to the point of organizing an operation which was totally unnecessary, an assault operation against this center, when local law enforcement had advised them beforehand, that the story they had gotten was all crap. They knew the people, knew the situation, and said if you want to serve a warrant over there, give it to the sheriff's department, and David Koresh will come in in response to the warrant, as he always has, whenever these things come up.

But at the point at which they had four dead bodies of Federal agents, even though the FBI came in to clean up the mess created by ATF's bungling, the fact of the four dead bodies and other factors, and the continuing influence of not only the Cult Awareness Network through its backers, the American Family Foundation, but also of the Anti-Defamation League, which has corrupted many law enforcement agencies in the country, the factions tied to the ADL, including the Quantico section of the FBI, moved to a cover-up.

The Houston Chronicle article infers--it does not state it, but it infers it, and the inference is based on statements that were not published--that this faction of the government did not want David Koresh ever to reach a courtroom for trial, because if he did, there would be an inquiry into the original warrant: Who had sworn to what, and why did the ATF swallow that bunch of hokum, to set this bloodbath into motion?

The best "solution," from the standpoint of the ADL and CAN, and those in the FBI and elsewhere, such as the Quantico unit, which had been penetrated and corrupted by the ADL, and that is a matter of fact, from their standpoint, was that they all be dead.

Therefore, at some point, a totally unnecessary operation is launched about 51 days after this whole thing began--and suddenly, they are all dead.

Now, who did what to whom at that point? What story is going around, is irrelevant.

The point is, that Koresh and his people wanted to live. They believed they had to get to court. They of course believed that they had to follow what they thought was the inspired message of God and believed that God would protect them, which explains their behavior, and however you want to criticize their theology, that is another matter. But you have to go by what they were, what they believed, and what they did.

On the other hand, those who tried to con the President of the United States and the Attorney General, wanted all of these people dead; they never wanted the thing to go to court.

Imagine: it goes to court, and the truth comes out. As Herb Brin, for example, has stated in an article published in a Jewish publication in Texas. The ADL is all over this thing, and we have evidence of that, as the San Francisco case, for example, on the ADL corruption of law enforcement nationally, indicates: that the ADL and CAN cooked this whole thing up, planted false information on a government department which they had partly corrupted or influenced in a corrupt way, to cause this thing to occur, and that those who are allied with the ADL and CAN in this operation, fearing that the case would be drawn into court and their whole dirty role would come out, which would mean the end of CAN and the ADL if this thing ever came out in court, were very happy to find that they are all dead--or virtually all dead--and they will put the eight survivors out of the way in some way, just bury the thing under the rug, and the case will never come to court--they hope, and thus the dirty role of the ADL and CAN in setting up this holocaust, can be kept under the rug.

I don't think that will happen. There is an international outcry on this, there are people in the Senate, there are people all over the place, there are people in Texas, who are very angry about this: I think there will be an exposure of this thing.

We have determined--and we have the official paperwork, that the ADL has been part of the training, monitoring, and intelligence unit for those FBI units based in Quantico. Quantico, naturally, is considered largely a Marine base, but it is also an FBI training center, and it is the base of the Hostage Response Team, the so-called "special forces" types of units of the FBI.

It was FBI-Quantico which was key in setting up this last phase of the operation, which led to the bloody holocaust.

The truth is, that we know how the Australian operation was run. We know what the CAN part of this operation was in chief. We know that the ATF was corrupted. We have indications which are crucial as to the nature of the corruption. We have from law enforcement people on the ground in the state of Texas, what they knew about the situation. Our people have followed Priscilla Coates and Rick Ross and the rest of these guys in Texas and what they were doing there.

We know the rap sheet, the criminal record of Rick Ross, the key affiant, in these operations. We have traced in Australia, on the ground, in detail, how the Australian side of this operation was set up to bring about this holocaust. We know the role of the ADL. We have been able to follow in detail the way in which the national news media--the broadcast media and much of the national print media, but especially the broadcast media--have been putting out the CAN garbage invented by CAN and the ADL.

We know, from our work on the ground, and some of the legal problems here; we know the strong motive that the Quantico and other sections of the FBI and other elements had for not allowing this case to come to court, not allowing that original warrant ever to be investigated, not allowing the original assault on the compound ever to be investigated under the eyes of due process.

We also know something very important, going back years, on paper. We know that the Anti-Defamation League, using, in part, in collaboration with the Cult Awareness Network--which is a throwaway front of undesirables, essentially, who do kidnapping for hire and who have been indicted repeatedly on this matter--that this network has penetrated law enforcement for many years, to corrupt effects, for its own advantage.

We have the San Francisco case, for example, which exposes a national pattern of corrupt penetration of police departments and other law enforcement agencies, to bring about unlawful actions by members of law enforcement agencies.

We have proof of the continuing, longstanding corrupt relationship between the Anti-Defamation League and the Justice Department in general, as well as the Federal Bureau of Investigation in particular--and of many other law enforcement agencies in the country.

So we know exactly what was going on. When Janet Reno speaks of "experts," she is speaking of the ADL, CAN, etc., etc., this crowd--this nest.

The only way this could have been avoided, is if the Clinton administration had recognized that this corrupt relationship, the corruption of law enforcement by groups like the Anti-Defamation League and CAN--the ADL is politically a very powerful group, because of its backing--is the root of the problem, and that they had to clean that out of there.

They had what is now on paper, the affidavits of law enforcement of the investigation show to be going back more than 25 years, that a network of agents run by a fellow called Irwin Suall out of the so-called Fact-Finding Division of the Anti-Defamation League in New York, and also out of the office, more recently, of a woman named Mira Lansky Boland, operating in Washington, D.C., have penetrated massively law enforcement; and they have hired agents to penetrate law enforcement agencies, and to corrupt them, ostensibly for four purposes: To influence law enforcement agencies' actions unlawfully; secondly, to cause law-enforcement agents to do things which are illegal; thirdly, to gain access to computers and so forth, to get information which it is unlawful for the ADL to have; and fourthly, apparently that is the charge, is to sell privileged information (which it is unlawful for the ADL to possess) to the Republic of South Africa security forces, and so on and so forth.

For example, this fellow (Hani) who was killed down in South Africa apparently was one of the names on that particular list.

This was not just San Francisco; more massively, it was Los Angeles, which is, of course, the Hollywood center of the ADL's operation; the Chicago law enforcement--the Chicago Police Department is massively penetrated--as well as Houston, Atlanta, and so forth and so on.

That is clear; there are times when the FBI was operating on the basis of a hard-wired relationship to ADL officers, the corruption there that I referred to, and that is only part of it.

We have court records showing how massively this has been going on--all kinds of unlawful actions.

What has happened, is that, purely on the basis of enforcing the law, the ADL and its agents and accomplices have been found breaking the law massively in a very serious way nationally in the tradition of Jonathan Pollard, who delivered secrets, effectively, to the Soviet Union--military secrets, which resulted, ostensibly, in the death of a number of U.S. agents in Russia, who were betrayed by this stuff. In the tradition of Jonathan Pollard, the ADL has been stealing information which it is illegal for it to acquire or to possess, and then delivering this information to foreign governments and so forth and so on.